
Understanding risk in transport carbon projects: Headwinds and tailwinds
Here are some key takeaways
Transport carbon projects span a diverse range of activities — from electric two-wheelers in sub-Saharan Africa to reduced engine-idling solutions in the USA — each with distinct risk profiles.
Permanence is a sector strength: avoided-emissions credits face very low reversal risk, in contrast to much of the nature-based solutions market.
Additionality and carbon accounting are where quality diverges, driven by the financial attractiveness of many transport activities without carbon finance and the difficulty of evidencing counterfactual behaviour at scale.
Design choices made early in project development, particularly around monitoring infrastructure and additionality documentation, have an outsized effect on long-term quality outcomes.
BeZero Carbon has rated transport projects across multiple sub-types and has worked with governments assessing Article 6.2 credits in the transport sector.
Contents
Introduction
What the transport sector covers
Additionality: carbon-financed, or already in motion?
Carbon accounting: making every mile count
Permanence: hard to backtrack
What we are seeing in the market
How BeZero Carbon can help